 | Pipe dream to help the Hawks |
pezzz123 writes "Here's Chicago Blackhawks offseason plan. I'm basically just throwing ideas out there to chat and have fun. Enjoy.
To Ottawa :
Brian Campbell Kyle Beach 2nd rounder
To Chicago :
Filip Kuba Alex Kovalev
Ottawa needs a true puck-mover, which Kuba isn't really. He's a very solid top 4 d-man, but they need a true #1 who can really jump-start the offense, especially with the loss of Heatley, and Alfredsson getting older and older. Karlsson will be the real deal, but he shouldn't get all the pressure right now. He's not 100% physically ready yet, so give him the time he needs. Ottawa also gets a powerforward prospect, which they're sorely lacking. In fact, they lack any prospect who's an almost sure-fire top 6. Beach is. And they shed Kovalev's salary in the process.
To Atlanta :
Alex Kovalev
To Chicago :
Joseph Crabb Tim Stapleton Brett Sterling
Atlanta gets a Russian to play with Kovalchuk. Kozlov and Afinogenov will likely be gone this summer, so Kovy will keep Kovy happy. And maybe they'll have some awesome chemistry, we never know. With only 1 year remaining on Kovalev's contract, it isn't much of a risk. Atlanta sends a couple of useless minor leaguers the other way to get some $$$ relief. See Schneider vs crap trade between Anaheim and Atlanta.
To New Jersey :
Cam Barker Kris Versteeg
To Chicago :
Dainius Zubrus Alexander Vasyunov 2nd rounder
With Paul Martin likely leaving as a free agent, Devils should be in the market for someone who can lead the rush and the PP. Oduya can't provide this all by himself, and Matt Corrente shouldn't be getting big minutes yet. Hence Barker. And who knows, he might learn to play sound defensive hockey under Lemaire. Versteeg will add some needed scoring punch and grit on the 2nd line. Zubrus acts as a salary shed to absorb the combined 6 millions of Versteeg and Barker. I, for one, think that even if the Hawks will be hard pressed to trade Versteeg and Barker in the summer, there will be a small bidding war for them. Hence Vasyunov and the 2nd rounder. In a normal situation the Hawks would've got more than this for each of them.
To Anaheim : Dainius Zubrus
To Chicago :
4th rounder
It's Selanne's last year in Anaheim. Same for Koivu. Ryan might be traded, even if it's a stretch. Holland is far from being ready. Bonino, Bolt, Deschamps and the MacMillan's are closer to being 3rd line grinders than scoring forwards. So who's gonna anchor the 2nd line? In the right environment, Zubrus is capable of 20 goals and 50+ points. He's pricey, but Murray's gonna be desperate for scoring. His job might be in danger if he doesn't perform next year.
July 1rst
Sign Joe Corvo. 1 year, 1.750 million.
Resign Andrew Ladd. 3 years, 6.75 million. Resign Jack Skille. 2 years, 1.6 million. Resign Ben Eager. 3 years, 4.5 million. Resign Colin Fraser. 2 years, 1.6 million. Resign Adam Burish. 2 years, 1.8 million. Resign Nicklas Hjalmarsson. 2 years, 3.5 million. Resign Antti Niemi. 2 years, 3 million.
Chicago Blackhawks in 2009-2010
Brouwer (1) - Toews (6.3) - Kane (6.3) Sharp (3.9) - Bolland (3.375) - Hossa (5.3) Ladd (2.25) - Kopecky (1.2) - Skille (.800) Eager (1.5) - Fraser (.800) - Burish (.900)
Keith (5.5) - Seabrook (3.5) Kuba (3.7) - Hjalmarsson (1.75) Corvo (1.75) - Danis-Pepin (.800)
Huet (5.6) Niemi (1.5)
Cap hit : 57.695 million
Thoughts?"
|
|
|
|
| "Pipe dream to help the Hawks" | Login/Create an Account | 16 comments |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Pipe dream to help the Hawks (Score: 1) by leafmeister (ottawasenators@willneverwinthecup.com) on Wednesday, December 16 (User Info | Send a Message) | No way would Chicago do that Ottawa deal. Chicago would get 2 million in cap space, lose a solid defender, and pick up dead weight in Kovalev and Kuba. Plus they would lose Kyle Beach and 2nd. Ottawa would have to put a lot more into that deal for Chicago to even consider it.
I know my Leaf-bias shines through here, but I would not be adverse to trading Kaberle for Campbell, but throwing in a lot of Chicago assets.
To Tor: Campbell Sopel Beach Olsen 2010 1st
To Chi: Kaberle
Major salary dump for Chicago, and they get the leagues 2nd highest scoring d-man in the process. They lose a lot of assets, but they gain a whole bunch of space moving forward, without making the team any worse.
The benefits are obvious with Toronto, Campbell replaces Kaberle, and they gain 3 1st rounders in the process.
At first sight it looks ridiculously one sided for the Leafs, but a deal like this could only come around once for Chicago.
|
|
|
Re: Pipe dream to help the Hawks (Score: 1) by pezzz123 on Wednesday, December 16 (User Info | Send a Message) | | Oups! I forgot Byfuglien. Send him to Montreal for two 2nd rounders. |
|
|
Re: Pipe dream to help the Hawks (Score: 1) by the_word on Thursday, December 17 (User Info | Send a Message) | After reading 101 Leafs take Sopel to get a pick trade scenarios, you'd think Hab fans might clue in in on the Chicago market...
Montreal has no future, no present and holes at every posiition.
Chicago is in desperate need for some goaltending depth at cost and needs to dump salary.
So if I was Bob Gainey and I felt like making a trade that didn't suck for once I'd offer up Halak for Sopel and at 1st round pick. Chicago gets to reunite Halak/Huet so they can battle out their medoicre and Chicago dumps a salary for breathing room and getting a player that can have an impact this year. The Habs blueline is ugly enough that Sopel could play quality minutes and who doesn't love a 1st round pick?
An alternative scenario could be....
Halak and PK Subban* for Seabrook, Sopel and a 2nd round pick. Habs get a legitimate young defenseman, a bad contract and a pick while Chicago gets a solid prospect, goaltending and a cap solution.
*Now for those that have decided Subban is a lock for the HoF, I disagree rather than subject me argument over his merits just change the 2nd round pick from Chicago to a 1st in your head as these proposals are meaningless anyway. |
|
|
| |
|