 | Trade Rumors: What now for Thomas? |
 Tim Thomas got his first NHL opportunity in Boston. He played in Providence for the Bruins’ AHL club. He spent four years in Burlington, Vt., starring for the University of Vermont. He makes his year-round home north of Boston. The native of Flint, Mich., considers himself a New Englander. But that status may be in doubt, considering the changing of the guard that took place this season.
“Certainly different than any other experience I’ve had as a pro,’’ Thomas said of 2009-10, when the reigning Vezina Trophy winner found himself on the bench for the entire postseason, supplanted in the Boston goal by Tuukka Rask. “It was challenging. You go through these types of situations and years. You’ve just got to try to find the lessons out of them and find a way to make yourself a better pro goaltender and a better person.’’
It wasn’t supposed to happen this way. Thomas was projected to retain the No. 1 job, perhaps into 2011-12, with Rask gradually seeing more and more action.
But with Rask grabbing the starting job and projected to be the go-to goalie in 2010-11, the future is unclear for Thomas, who will enter the second season of his four-year, $20 million contract, which includes a no-trade clause. If Rask plays himself into the starting role again next season, it would not be prudent to have Thomas and his $5 million annual salary growing moldyon the bench.
For Thomas, a move — and a waiving of his no-trade — could put him back into a No. 1 position. It is a scenario that Thomas said he has not had time to consider.
“After the kind of drought that Boston’s had and the way this year’s playoffs ended up, it would be poetic justice if the Bruins could get over that hump and really accomplished the ultimate goal of winning a Cup,’’ Thomas said. “A certain part of me, for sure, would like to be here for that. It’s part of the whole thinking process that has to go into it. That’s nowhere near complete.’’
Trading Thomas , however, may not be so simple. While new Panthers general manager Dale Tallon may rethink the issue, Florida had made it known that Tomas Vokoun is available in trade. The 33-year-old Vokoun (23-28-11, 2.55 goals-against average, .925 save percentage) is due $5.7 million next season. Goalies who will reach unrestricted status July 1 include Marty Turco , Chris Mason , Evgeni Nabokov , and Dan Ellis . Carey Price will be a restricted free agent, but the Canadiens will be sure to make Jaroslav Halak , who will also be an RFA, their first priority.
http://www.boston.com/sports/hockey/bruins/articles/2010/05/19/what_now_for_thomas/
|
|
|
|
| "What now for Thomas?" | Login/Create an Account | 28 comments |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: What now for Thomas? (Score: 1) by hockeyhead (LucicCrew@HubHockey.com) on Friday, May 21 (User Info | Send a Message) | what was PC on when he signed thomas to that contract?
good luck trading him now. |
|
|
Re: What now for Thomas? (Score: 1) by Boston_Bruins (sdhfsbhf@hotmail.com) on Friday, May 21 (User Info | Send a Message) | | Not sure who plays NHL here but for NHL 11 they're adding CHL teams this year. Maybe I'm just a hockey/video game nerd but I think this is HUGE news. The one thing hockey games have been lacking I think is a better prospect system. No more random names. |
|
|
Re: What now for Thomas? (Score: 1) by Dunski23 on Friday, May 21 (User Info | Send a Message) | I personally don't see Thomas getting moved in the off-season. The market has a lot of goalies available for a lot less money. I think most teams looking for a goalie will go that route before trading for Thomas. I, however, also don't see Thomas making it through the year as a Bruin. As the year goes on I see some of the cheaper route goalie signings failing or some team having a devastating goalie injury. I see Thomas getting moved closer to the deadline. This could be good for Boston because right now Thomas' value is low. At the deadline a desperate GM could give Boston a far better package then what Thomas could fetch over the summer. I also don't believe the B's can sign all 3 of their FA D-men (*****ing Ference Deal) I think The B's will sign Seidenberg and Boychuk. Those two are UFA's (Boychuk's status just changed to UFA). They can then trade Stuart's rights for either picks or prospects.
In the offseason I'd like to see the B's Sign these players Sobotka 3 yrs / 750K per Thornton Whatever / 550K per Boychuk 3 yrs / 1.75M Per Seids 4 yrs / 3.5 Per Wheels 3 yrs / 2.5 per McQuaid 2 yrs / 650K per Recchi (if he doesn't retire) 1 yr / 1M Seguin (because i don't believeTambellini will pass on Hall) Rookie contract + 2.6M Bonus Trade Ryder to NJ for the rights to David Clarkson sign Clarkson 2 yr / 2M per
Lines (to Start the Season)
Lucic (4.083) Savard (4.007) Seguin (3.450) - 11.54M Wheels (2.5) Krejci (3.750) Clarkson (2.0) - 8.25M Sobotka (.750) Bergeron (4.750) Recchi (1.0) - 6.5M Thornton (.550) Whitfield (.550) Marchand (.590) - 1.69M Sturm (3.5) (starts season on IR when he returns his cap is lowered i believe, but not sure)
Chara (7.5) Seidenberg (3.5) - 11M Wides (3.875) Boychuk (1.75) - 5.625M Ference (2.25) McQuaid (.650) - 2.9M Hunwick (1.45)
Rask (1.25) Thomas (5) - 6.25M
Total Cap Hit 55.115 + whatever Sturm's Cap Hit actually is. Doesn't look all that good, but to me that looks like about the best team the B's will be able to have with their cap problems...(and it's generous from a B's fans point of view)
Now to explain some of the stuff i suggested:
Clarkson Trade: NJ is looking like they won't be able to resign Kovie. They could use some second tier scoring to cover the loss. Ryder is in a contract year which could light a fire under his ass. Also, in NJ there will be other players for teams top D to worry about. With severe injuries to Boston's first line the Krejci, Wheeler, Ryder line saw a lot a other teams top D pairs. In NJ Ryder won't be THE guy so he'll have more favorable match ups. I feel that is a big problem for him. It happened in MTL where teams could focus on him and not have to worry about their secondary scoring. First year in Boston teams focused on Lucic, Savard, Kessel so Ryder flourished. Second year in Boston that "shield" was gone and top pairs shut him (and that entire line) down. Boston gets a true agitator (not like Begin who didn't get the job done) Thing is Clarkson has pretty good skill to go along with his style of play. I consider him a version (not quite on the same level) of Burrows. I think giving him a chance to play with Krejci will be good for him. He showed it this year in an injury plagued season. I think in a full season with Krejci he could really flourish....( and he won't be as invisible as Ryder). Bruins also get a little cap help to spend else where.
Resigning Wheeler I think people are hating on Wheeler because they got their hopes up way too high after last season. He was an easy scapegoat because of his size and seemingly unwillingness to use it. HE'S NOT THAT TYPE OF PLAYER. Kid has amazing hands and good creativity and vision. He is also young and still getting used to the NHL game. Boston has a history of
Read the rest of this comment... |
|
|
Re: What now for Thomas? (Score: 1) by Tachmo on Saturday, May 22 (User Info | Send a Message) | yah. i just checked out Campbell's contract and that is a tad disgusting. He is locked up to 2016. He has been a huge force on the blueline in these playoffs. But that 7.14 million per is huge.
Wheeler is a panty. He was playing like a man on fire last year for a period. I don't know what happened to that kind of play? He does not go to the tough areas. It is hard to score goals at any level when you stick to the perimeter and don't get into the tough areas and don't go to the net. After saying all that I think he still has some potential. I'd like to see them resign him at a maxium 2 mil per. Anything more he should be traded.
Does anyone know the timeline on Colbourne? Is Hammil ever going to play in the NHL? Was Soderberg acquired by Toivonen? I wish they didn't draft a zillion centerman when they did. |
|
|
| |
|